Chris Murphy wrote:
> If there is a directory that contains update and non-update related file
> changes, that's a problem. If there's segmentation, then this can be done.
>
> Clearly /home needs to be separate (it's OK to take a snapshot but just
> don't use it by default in a rollback) or we lose changes in /home in a
> rollback from the time of the snapshot to the time of the decision to
> rollback.
>
> Another possible case it's /etc/ where the either a package or the user
> could make changes during the update.
There's also /root, and then the most annoying case: /var. /var/lib/rpm
definitely needs to be rolled back, but you DON'T want to roll back things
such as log files in /var/log or systemwide databases (other than the RPM
database).
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
