On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 17:32:27 +0200 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:
> what does *not* matter in case of "yum distro-sync" because it does > also downgrades and if fedup has a problem with it the people who say > yum is not officially supported (while no support in any case exists) > should ask theirself who in the world needs fedup instead keep > fous on *one* well working tool > > besides the fact that yum-upgrades are most times better > yum is used and tested every single day from thousands > of users while "fedup" no normal user touchs half a year You misunderstand how fedup works. It gathers up the packages you will need to do the upgrade, then reboots into a very minimal env and uses yum to do the upgrade. The difference is that since it's in a minimal env, you don't have possible problems with running processes, and you can make changes that would otherwise not be possible to a running system. If you use and like yum dist upgrades on running systems, thats great. However, fedup is more safe since it's not happening on a running system. kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
