On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Zach Brown <z...@zabbo.net> wrote: >> So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe absolutely >> must be fixed before it can become the default > > I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs. > > But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the first to admit that I'm > pretty risk averse, especially when it comes to losing data and > rendering machines unbootable. > > Is there an existing set of criteria that Fedora would use to determine > that btrfs is sufficiently reliable to use as the default for new > installs?
Not really. The de facto criteria would be "as stable as the current default", which is ext4. That is also somewhat subjective. josh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
