Could you provide a link to that discussion? Thanks
2012/11/9 Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> > On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 01:12 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > It's not one of our supported upgrade mechanisms, and there appears to > > > be no chance of that changing. > > > > That's the whole problem. Why is our most reliable upgrade mechanism not > > "supported"? > > > > > Please don't warm over that argument again. > > > > Why not? > > Because it's a complete and utter waste of time to keep reanimating the > argument without making any different points. You make your points > again, the other side makes its points again, nothing changes and you > have all wasted your time. Why bother? > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
