On 8 Nov 2012 07:35, "Kevin Kofler" <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote: > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > The new anaconda UI and related features are more or less entirely the > > cause of the slip. > > This shows that those changes should not have been done, or at least not in > this way.
Hindsight is a fabulous thing, I suspect the anaconda developers would agree with you looking back. Its a large body of code dependent on a lots of pieces. > > Secure boot support is also not done yet (waiting on the signature for > > shim to get sorted out by legal), though I don't know whether FESCo yet > > absolutely decided that has to be in for Beta. > > And Restricted Boot support just needs to go away! And with it will go Fedora's ability to support a lot of new hardware moving forward and I don't believe that's good for anyone. The developers have done a lot of work to make it easily handle a vast amount of use cases and I think its great the work they've done. The hardware is coming so its pointless for us to stick our heads in the sand. Besides this thread is a about beta slip. Not pros and cons of already approved feature. Peter Peter
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
