Am 03.11.2012 11:35, schrieb Nikos Roussos:

> In that sense, and from my point of view, if we had to rethink our release 
> model and dedicate time and energy on a
> new approach, it would make more sense to have an extended support release 
> (providing only security updates after
> 13 months) which is vital for the enterprise desktop market.

THAT would make sense if there is a upgrade path between two LTS
releases - let's say the cycle is two years there would be 4
"normal" release cycles and if features with the impact of
systemd are startet after the release of a LTS you have the
full 2 years to polish it AND many users would also use
the current leading edge releases to be first

a comination of both would be really perfect

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to