On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Andrea Musuruane <musur...@gmail.com> wrote: > There still seems to be problems. I rebuilt it locally with an updated > F16 and now I get: > $ rpm -qp --requires > /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tecnoballz-0.92-13.fc16.src.rpm > autoconf > SDL_image-devel > SDL_mixer-devel > mikmod-devel > tinyxml-devel > desktop-file-utils > rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > > As you can see now it misses at least explicit requires > (hicolor-icon-theme) and others too (/bin/sh, config(tecnoballz), > etc).
Would explicit requires be required by the source RPM? I would think they would only be added to the binary RPMS. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
