Am 27.01.2012 18:33, schrieb Bill Nottingham: > Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) said: >> On 01/27/2012 06:05 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>> Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said: >>>> Actually... we will "always" need the compat symlinks (for a finite but >>>> definitely long value of "always"). Third party scripts, scripts that have >>>> been in use on local systems, written by people who have long since passed >>>> on (to new jobs), people targetting FHS compliant systems (unless the FHS >>>> changes), etc will all depend on those symlinks being present. Even third >>>> party software that users want to compile and run may try to install into >>>> /bin, /sbin, and /lib so we may have that problem even there. >>> >>> And things like /bin/sh are compiled into glibc... >> >> And hard coded into 1000s of scripts and packages. >> >> I seriously think, Fedora has many urgent problems to address than >> the churn this "Feature" causes. > > ? There's no churn required due to packages having /bin/sh in them
if you finally want get rid of /bin it is if you finally want have /bin as symlink forever this whole change is only wasted time and makes no sense at all
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
