On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Jan F. Chadima <jchad...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:02 PM, drago01 wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Jan F. Chadima <jchad...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:03 AM, drago01 wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Jan F. Chadima <jchad...@redhat.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> [...] >>>>> . When watching the load of the virtual machine that starts with systemd >>>>> it is clear to me that the total CPU consumption is significantly greater >>>>> than in the case of upstart one. >>>> >>>> That's the whole point of doing things in parallel ... the CPU is >>>> actually being *used* hence the higher CPU consumption. When you have >>>> work to do you want to throw all resources at it. To get back to your >>>> digger analogy ... when you employ 10 workers you'd rather want all of >>>> them to work not one doing all the work and the other 9 just sitting >>>> around. >>> >>> better is 1 working and 9 sitting than 10 injured :) >> >> Well why not fire the other 9 and save money then? ;) > > so cut off the remanding cores from the CPU, save only one, good luck :D
No I mean either write software to take advantage of them (i.e use them) or save money and buy slower / cheaper CPUs because you prefer software that does not use the available resources when needed. I prefer the former you seem to prefer the later ;) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
