On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:02 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Jan F. Chadima <jchad...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On Sep 15, 2011, at 11:03 AM, drago01 wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Jan F. Chadima <jchad...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> . When watching the load of the virtual machine that starts with systemd >>>> it is clear to me that the total CPU consumption is significantly greater >>>> than in the case of upstart one. >>> >>> That's the whole point of doing things in parallel ... the CPU is >>> actually being *used* hence the higher CPU consumption. When you have >>> work to do you want to throw all resources at it. To get back to your >>> digger analogy ... when you employ 10 workers you'd rather want all of >>> them to work not one doing all the work and the other 9 just sitting >>> around. >> >> better is 1 working and 9 sitting than 10 injured :) > > Well why not fire the other 9 and save money then? ;)
so cut off the remanding cores from the CPU, save only one, good luck :D > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Jan F. Chadima jchad...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
