Nils Philippsen wrote:
> We shouldn't revert to untagging broken packages in Rawhide just to make
> it less consequential for people to break stuff. We should revert to
> untagging broken packages because bumping epoch is costlier in the long
> run as epoch is often disregarded. People using Rawhide should probably
> use "yum distro-sync" rather than "yum update".
I agree that abuse of Epoch sucks, and indeed, it isn't really needed in
Rawhide now that there is distro-sync.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
