On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:44:35AM -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > On 09/11/2011 04:33 AM, Jim Meyering wrote: > > darrell pfeifer wrote: > >> Fails for me too, with the same error. > > > > Thanks for confirming that. > > > > I don't mean to be rude or inflammatory, but do have to wonder how such > > a fundamentally-broken package was released -- even to rawhide. In the > > fedora openssh release process, isn't there some sort of sanity check > > that would catch this before inflicting it on all rawhide users? > > Maybe there needs to be a classification for rawhide similar to the > karma system for updates-testing, but limited to just a set of packages > that should just always work (maybe openssh would be one). For such > packages, there should be a test validation set that the maintainer runs > to automatically allow the package into rawhide.
AutoQA will eventually allow to run functional tests for packages afaik. This is imho the right place to put more effort into. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
