On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com>wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 12:16 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > seth vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said: > > > > > My suggestion is that you keep both init systems, SysV/LSB and > systemd, > > > > > as separate offerings out of many, and forever so. > > > > > > > > We'll take that under advisement. > > > > > > Ajax, > > > That remark is also unnecessary and just comes across as snarky. The > > > only thing this will achieve is to keep other people from being willing > > > to comment on issues in the future. > > > > So, the preference is to say nothing at all? > > I'd suggest something along the lines of 'sorry, but maintaining two > officially-supported init systems side-by-side is an excessive burden on > package maintainers and quality assurance, so we won't be doing it'. > It's hard to go wrong by just politely saying what you mean. But as someone who is maintaining his own package... Won't I have to maintain two different init system support files for both systemd based distros and "all the other Linux and Unix distros" I also run on?
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
