On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 15:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de> writes: > > On Mon, 18.07.11 15:34, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> Well, if they didn't need fixed before, they'll certainly need fixed > >> when you make them start keeping their configuration info someplace else > >> than /etc/sysconfig. This proposal sounds more like "wait, systemd has > >> not yet broken everything in sight, how can we solve that problem?" > >> than like something that will actually improve matters for anyone. > > > What does systemd break in this regard? > > There's a big difference between "a daemon might not need /etc/sysconfig > anymore once it's been fully integrated into the systemd world" and > "let's deprecate /etc/sysconfig and force packages to stop using it". > Maybe you meant the first, but it's coming across as the second.
Observation suggests that you often need to assert the latter in order to achieve the former, when it comes to herding cats^H^H^H^Hopen source developers... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
