On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 22:44 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > It's certainly true that we could do more to identify ftbfs situations > earlier, but we've had mass rebuilds in most recent releases. Random > failures years down the line really aren't a realistic concern.
I can think of specific cases where dependent packages failed to rebuild 6 months later because of an earlier change, and I'm sure we can find some involving years at a time. Further, there are some noarch packages that haven't been rebuilt in many releases, but that's another issue. Jon. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
