On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> wrote: >> If this is under way, could extension makers be pointed towards it to >> future-proof their extensions. > > I'm not sure what you mean by this.
Searching around now, it looks like Looking Glass (alt+f2 "lg") already registers the extensions so maybe not much else needs to be done in the extensions to take advantage of future enhancements to extension management. Also, wrt. yum as the existing manager for now, is there some policy on one extension per package, package naming, configuration formats, etc.? Right now, a lot of extensions are only available via instructions to just git clone development trees right into your extension directories which is bypassing a lot of review, auditing, and sanity processes. Is there anyone shepherding these into sane and consistent rpm packages? /Mike -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
