On 04/19/2011 03:35 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > However this > is a big pain to maintain, not least because whenever a new > incompatible version comes along we have to apply for a new Unison > package to be added to Fedora(!)
Right, it's a shame there's no --protocol= flag. I'd assume, being that Fedora likes to track upstream, we'd call the current build 'unison' and then the older binaries 'unison213' and 'unison227'? On 04/19/2011 11:34 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > FWIW, I'm in this mess too, but I was lazy and decided to just hack up > the spec to build the version I need locally rather than do anything to > 'properly' fix up the packages. Oh, good. Is it 2.40.61? If so, the real work to be done is in combining the three sub-builds into one .spec and then applying for a new 'unison' package? -Bill -- Bill McGonigle, Owner BFC Computing, LLC http://bfccomputing.com/ Telephone: +1.603.448.4440 Email, IM, VOIP: b...@bfccomputing.com VCard: http://bfccomputing.com/vcard/bill.vcf Social networks: bill_mcgonigle/bill.mcgonigle -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
