On Thu, Nov 6 2025 at 05:07:21 PM +01:00:00, Milan Crha
<[email protected]> wrote:
I mean, having a crash report and being able to ask the reporter for
help and maybe testing are two very different things. It does not
matter if a certain crash happened to thousands of people when the
developers cannot reproduce it and when they cannot ask for steps,
help
and such. The FAF reports are only about backtraces, not about steps,
communication with the reporters,...
Well that's all true, but I'm afraid FAF is what we're left with, since
reporting to Red Hat Bugzilla is already barely useful nowadays due to
the confusing API key requirement. I think very few users are still
willing to report bugs with ABRT. We should probably just remove the
report to Red Hat Bugzilla functionality.
To make manual bug reports useful again, we should focus on (a)
reporting directly to upstream (e.g. GNOME GitLab), and (b) reporting
to the new Fedora Forge, since presumably we'll want to start tracking
downstream bugs there instead of on Red Hat Bugzilla.
We'd need some configration mechanism to specify where the bug reports
for each package go, since some upstream developers won't want to
receive ABRT reports from Fedora, and some Fedora packagers might
prefer to receive them downstream rather than upstream.
Michael
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
