On Fri, Jul 18, 2025, 6:45 AM Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote:
> * Josh Boyer: > > > Do you have a reference to a court in another region that has stated > > an opposite view? Or perhaps some proposed legislation from > > somewhere? > > No legislation is required because creators' rights do not derive from > an Act of Congress in most parts of the world. The U.S. notion that > copyright serves purpose to promote progress is completely alien to > other jurisdictions. If they recognize the right to personal property > at all, they view the right to intellectual property as a basic human > right, growing from exactly the same source as other property rights. > I find that all well and good for works created by humans. AI is not a human so it is not obvious to me how the concept of "property" or "rights" apply to output generated by a machine. It's not clear to me how this shapes the conversation much. At best it seems to lend itself exactly towards what the US consensus is, but I feel like that wasn't your intent. josh
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
