> Cross-compiling from x86_64 will likely only avoid to build a i686
> compiler. It's worth a try though.
>
> At least building a small set of i686 packages will likely be the way
> to go. Even if the packages list is moving, it will still be easier to
> maintain. Especially if i686 is using a reduced feature set (no
> generated docs, etc).

I think for Mesa it would remove a bunch of build requires like
python/meson/ninja etc from needing 32-bit versions,

we'd still need a 32-bit capable gcc/rust/llvm

Dave.
>
> The stronger argument against the reduced list strategy is to report
> i686 failures in projects earlier in the goal of overall code
> correctness distro wide.
> --
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to