> Cross-compiling from x86_64 will likely only avoid to build a i686 > compiler. It's worth a try though. > > At least building a small set of i686 packages will likely be the way > to go. Even if the packages list is moving, it will still be easier to > maintain. Especially if i686 is using a reduced feature set (no > generated docs, etc).
I think for Mesa it would remove a bunch of build requires like python/meson/ninja etc from needing 32-bit versions, we'd still need a 32-bit capable gcc/rust/llvm Dave. > > The stronger argument against the reduced list strategy is to report > i686 failures in projects earlier in the goal of overall code > correctness distro wide. > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
