On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 01:10:39PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> And I think that's still the right way to do it. Today, glibc32 only
> provides what GCC needs to build its -m32 bits, it's not a generally
> useful 32-bit development or execution environment.
I'd like to correct that, glibc32 (which is still a hack even in current
form, sure, the earlier one was uglier; in any case a workaround for lack
of multilib support in koji) is something that is sufficient for the x86_64
build of gcc to have its side of 32-bit support, but most of it comes from
gcc build in i686 environment right now. In order to build gcc only during
the x86_64.rpm build such that it would have all the needed 32-bit libraries
(shared and static), we'd need more libraries than what is in glibc32.
Jakub
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
