Dne 29. 04. 25 v 12:59 Benson Muite napsal(a):
Hi Ankur,

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025, at 10:50 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi folks,

Sorry, forgot to include the link to the COPR. It's here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ankursinha/rubygem-taskjuggler/

On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 20:44:06 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi all,

Taskjuggler[1] is a powerful project management tool that was retired
from Fedora after being orphaned for a while. Indeed, back in the day,
the Fedora release schedule was generated using Taskjuggler---the
examples still include one for the Fedora 20 release cycle[2].

I use it for my work, so I've got a COPR going here for myself[3]. It
seems to build and work fine. I've just updated it to the latest
release. However, I'm not a Ruby programmer myself, and am not too well
versed with the ecosystem. So, I use gem2rpm to generate the spec and
then go through the guidelines to fix what I can.  The latest version
builds fine, but a couple of BRs are missing to run the tests.


Seems this is the failing test suite, right?


https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ankursinha/rubygem-taskjuggler/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08910683-rubygem-taskjuggler/builder-live.log.gz


Given the test case name:

~~~

  2) TaskJuggler::StatusSheetTest TaskJuggler::StatusSheetSender should have generated 1 mail

~~~


And comparing with the last know Fedora version of the .spec:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-taskjuggler/blob/20c97f4e0dbf3e5af96bb0688ef8256d467fe0e4/f/rubygem-taskjuggler.spec

Isn't the `BuildRequires: rubygem(mail)` what is missing?

And yes, there seems to be two parts of the test suite, one using rubygem-rspec while the other seems to be using rubygem-test-unit (yes, the former .spec file tried to convert the test suite to be executed by Minitest, but don't do that, stay with rubygem-test-unit and save some troubles to you). Executing the test/all.rb for the latter should be enough.


Vít



Happy to help with this.

Are Ruby folks interested in co-maintaining Taskjuggler by chance? It'll
be great to bring it back into Fedora, but I wouldn't want to do it
alone.

[1] https://github.com/taskjuggler/TaskJuggler
[2] https://github.com/taskjuggler/TaskJuggler/tree/master/examples/Fedora-20

--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London

--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Attachments:
* signature.asc

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to