On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 10:34:51AM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
>    On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 at 17:44, Kevin Fenzi <[1]ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
> 
>      I agree with downthread folks that that seems like way too high a
>      failure rate to enable gating on. However, a few questions if I can:
> 
>    Yes the failure rate is quite high and most of these are real failures,
>    that we deal with in Fedora CoreOS. So I am reading this like, because the
>    tests are catching too many failures we should continue ignoring them 🫤

I think what is scaring people with the data you've provided is that we do not
know which %/numbers of these failures are genuine failures that should gate the
update because they are bugs vs infrastructure/pipeline issues.
Would you have a way to distinguish between the two? Basically a failure vs
error output.

The push-back I'm hearing is more toward: there are a lot of failures here and
if they are all related to infrastructure issues then we're going to cause
disruption without a clear benefits.
Now if you're able to say: "95% of these errors are genuine bug that today are
impacting our users despite our pipeline having found it and 5% are
infrastructure related", that's a different story :)

My 2cts,

Pierre
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to