On 2/13/25 11:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I agree with downthread folks that that seems like way too high a > failure rate to enable gating on. However, a few questions if I can: > > Is this reporting to bodhi for all these components? > Off hand checking a few I don't see any results from this?
Hmm. Anytime a test gets run it should report results to bodhi. One thing that might be tripping us up is these metrics are based on the activity in our matrix channel https://matrix.to/#/#jenkins-coreos:fedoraproject.org and IIUC we might have an issue where the reported RPM in the matrix message that gets sent out *may* not be the actual RPM we're tracking (i.e. if an update has 5 packages in it the reported failure may be against an RPM we're actually not tracking, but the overall test and reported failure to bodhi are valid). This is probably how emacs got in the list of failures. > Wouldn't a good first step be to enable (non gating) these to show up > there so maintainers/you can be more aware and help reduce problems? Is there an example where you think the test should have reported results to bodhi, but didn't? It's probably what I mentioned above. > > Also, I see in the table a few packages have really high failure rate. > (nbdkit, makedumpfile, etc). Perhaps fixing these would lower the entire > failure rate a good deal? Indeed, we're improving all the time! Dusty -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
