On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 02:13:02PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> At the fundamental level, such automation would effectively do two
> steps:
> 1. create a no-change commit like we do now,
> 2. push the commit and fire off a build.
> 
> (I think we want to keep 1. unchanged. We need to store the information
> why did the rebuild and why _somewhere_. Either we keep the current
> mechanism which works well and is easy for humans to interact with,
> or we store this information in some external database and create new
> tools to query this. I don't think we want to do this.)

Aleksandra has  a long-standing proposal for putting this in a "build id" in
the binary RPM. https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2031


Is the "why" important long-term?

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mat...@fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to