Dne 28. 01. 25 v 18:53 Siddhesh Poyarekar napsal(a):
On 2025-01-28 05:19, Vít Ondruch wrote:4) Having everything rebuild by GCC 15? That on itself is not a goal IMHO. Making sure everything works with GCC 15 is good goal, but that is problem for developers, not for users (we can argue if there are CVEs, this might become problem, but this is not reflected in the schedule anyway). What percent of packages are actually using GCC these days? My gut guess is that it is not majority anymore. Having targeted minimassIt is still the majority I would reckon,
Is this the right query? ~~~$ run0 dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide-source --whatrequires gcc | wc -l
Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. 5001 ~~~If it is, then it is 20 % of Fedora packages (I have 24386 .spec files from not so old [1] laying around) . If nothing else, I can say ~350 (out of 450) of Ruby packages (i.e. 1.4% of all packages) were not needed to rebuild for the toolchain update.
Vít [1] https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz
but that's beside the point, because the discussion is not just about GCC, it's about all major toolchain updates before a mass rebuild.I would reword this goal as "have everything rebuilt with the new toolchain to incorporate optimization, security and diagnostics improvements". Users care about it as much as they would care about clean drinking water, i.e. it is taken for granted.Sid
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
