On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 10:43 AM Clemens Lang <cll...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi Neal, > > > On 18. Dec 2024, at 10:21, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > One thing I hope we never do is allow something to be principally > > owned by groups as a rule. > > See https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stunnel, or > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnutls, owned by @crypto-team.
Looks like there are multiple different things being conflated here: The "main admin" of neither of these packages is the @crypto-team group - groups *cannot* be the "main admin". There are some "legacy" groups (that predate the actual concept of "groups" AFAIK) that *act* as groups but which are normal user accounts (for example, "java-sig") that just happen to be shared between multiple people. Those *can* be "main admin". Then there is the default bugzilla assignee, which *can* be a group too, but the default bugzilla assignee is not the "main admin". Being orphaned means that the "main admin" is "orphan", the default bugzilla assignee is set independent of that. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
