Dne 16. 12. 24 v 2:13 odp. Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
If PP status were intended to beonly for the reason given in the original requests, then it seems to me that in some cases PP status would be something inherently time limited and thus revoked after the stated reason is satisfied. That isn't how we handle it though. PP status defaults to indefinite, except for our periodic purge of inactive + uncontactable people.
I believe it is because most reasons are aligned with indefinite timeframe: rel-engs to do release-bumps during mass rebuilds. Python, Perl, ... SIG members to do release bumps during mass rebuild. They do that until end of world, their death, or when they stop contributing to Fedora - whatever will come first.
I just checked some recent requests [1] and there are indeed numourous requests with no reason stated. This surprise me. [1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issues?search_pattern=provenpackager&status=Closed -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
