On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 01:57:03PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 16. 12. 24 v 11:17 dop. Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a):
> > By all means have personal preferences, but if someone is following
> > documented Fedora procedures that should be considered fine, even if
> > it doesn't align with personal preferences.
> 
> PPs must state why they want PP status [1]. I always thought that they
> should only use PP rights for that reason only [2].

I think that viewpoint is somewhat at odds with how we administer PP status.

If PP status were intended to be /only/ for the reason given in the original
requests, then it seems to me that in some cases PP status would be something
inherently time limited and thus revoked after the stated reason is satisfied.
That isn't how we handle it though. PP status defaults to indefinite, except
for our periodic purge of inactive + uncontactable people.

Thus, to me the reason given when applying to PP status is merely a point
in time example. It is a way to judge whether the person's initial intent
is sensible, and perhaps a bar against which to evaluate their early actions
as PP. Assuming they've proven themselves trustworthy initially, PP status
is effectively "for life" (assuming no bad faith actions), and the initial
reason isn't something that limits what they are expected to do long term.

This is similar to how a person being sponsored into the packager group
has their first package review as the justification. Once they're past
that hurdle, they can do any task for which a packager has rights, on
any package they become (co)maintainer of, not be limited to just the
initial package.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to