But to your specific question about `%patch` syntax, there is a hope that RHEL will support the new syntax:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-6294 Vít Dne 29. 10. 24 v 10:08 Susi Lehtola napsal(a):
Hi,
it appears rpm has now deprecated the old %patch syntax in rawhide, which means
that any old-style expressions
%patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
must now be written as
%patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
Unfortunately, all the epel branches, in turn, do not support the new %patch
syntax. This means that one either
- cannot use the same spec file to build in epel or
- must introduce conditionals and duplicate code in the spec files
%if 0%{?epel} < 10
%patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
%else
%patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
%endif
Is there any hope of fixing this issue, or altenatively, a known workaround that
is compatible in both branches?
Susi
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
