Hi Susi,

Susi Lehtola <jussileht...@fedoraproject.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
>
> it appears rpm has now deprecated the old %patch syntax in rawhide, which 
> means
> that any old-style expressions
>
> %patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
>
> must now be written as
>
> %patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
>
> Unfortunately, all the epel branches, in turn, do not support the new %patch
> syntax. This means that one either
> - cannot use the same spec file to build in epel or
> - must introduce conditionals and duplicate code in the spec files
>
> %if 0%{?epel} < 10
> %patch0 -p1 -b .overflow
> %else
> %patch 0 -p1 -b .overflow
> %endif
>
> Is there any hope of fixing this issue, or altenatively, a known workaround 
> that
> is compatible in both branches?

The following should work on all rpm versions [1]:
%patch -P1


Cheers,

Dan

Footnotes:
[1]  https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/spec.html#patch-1

-- 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to