On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:02 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:49:36PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote: > > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fedora-repoquery_tool > > Discussion Thread - > > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-fedora-repoquery-tool-self-contained/126066 : > Oh, fedrq vs. fdrq. I expect that this is going to cause endless > confusion. People will think it's a typo, not a separate project. > (I just read this text, looked at the review request, and I > immediately wanted to ask why 'fedora-repoquery' creates a symlink as > 'fdrq', won't that conflict with the existing package? But of course > it doesn't.) > > Did you consider giving it some completely different name? > Thanks, I am thinking... there have already been some related comments in Discourse. People can use the long alias "fedora-repoquery" of course. I would like to have a short name too though: since the long name is far too long for me. I am open to ideas/suggestions I suppose. Today I thought "frq" might be a more distinct name than fdrq. Jens
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
