On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 09:49:36PM +0100, Aoife Moloney wrote: > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fedora-repoquery_tool > Discussion Thread - > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f41-change-proposal-fedora-repoquery-tool-self-contained/126066
> == Detailed Description == > fedora-repoquery (fdrq for short) has been in development for a while, > and with the 0.6 release now > should be polished enough now to be included in Fedora for broader usage. > See the [https://github.com/juhp/fedora-repoquery#readme readme] file > for usage examples. > > I am aware of fedrq which is somewhat similar to fedora-repoquery, but > has a different design and emphasis. > The biggest difference being that fedora-repoquery supports easily > querying different OS release versions, > and also tells you by default in which specific repo a partcular package > lives. Oh, fedrq vs. fdrq. I expect that this is going to cause endless confusion. People will think it's a typo, not a separate project. (I just read this text, looked at the review request, and I immediately wanted to ask why 'fedora-repoquery' creates a symlink as 'fdrq', won't that conflict with the existing package? But of course it doesn't.) Did you consider giving it some completely different name? Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
