Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Neal Gompa wrote: >> I think the immediate fix is pulling in redict once it makes its first >> release: https://codeberg.org/redict/redict > > Once concern I have with this is the use of LGPL 3.0 *only*. This will not > be compatible with a GPL 4 or newer. (The upgrade clause in the LGPLv2 > that allowed that was unfortunately dropped in the LGPLv3, now you have to > put the "or later" clause on the LGPLed code to be compatible with newer > GPL versions.)
Also, the discussion under: https://discourse.writefreesoftware.org/t/redis-switches-to-dual-source-available-licensing-model/154 makes it pretty clear that the person behind the fork has no intent to make any compromises on this issue. For the redis executable, I guess this is not a blocking issue, but they also intend to fork the hiredis library (which currently is still BSD- licensed upstream [https://github.com/redis/hiredis]), and there, LGPL 3.0 only would really be a problem in the long run. Kevin Kofler -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
