My concern there is that it has 7 code contributors with just one person having the vast majority of those commits. That's not a problem for including the package, but it could be a concern for replacing redis with it given how young the project is and for it having significantly less resources than KeyDB (which has over 500 code contributors). -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
- Redis will no longer be OSS... now what? Neal Gompa
- Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what... Jonathan Wright via devel
- Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now ... Neal Gompa
- Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... ... Jonathan Wright via devel
- Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... Scott Williams
- Re: Redis will no longer b... Jonathan Wright via devel
- Re: Redis will no long... Scott Williams
- Re: Redis will no ... Scott Williams
- Re: Redis will no ... Neal Gompa
- Re: Redis will no ... Scott Williams
- Re: Redis will no ... Jonathan Wright via devel
- Re: Redis will no ... Kevin Kofler via devel
- Re: Redis will no ... Kevin Kofler via devel
- Re: Redis will no ... Michael Catanzaro
- Re: Redis will no ... Kevin Kofler via devel
- Re: Redis will no ... Onuralp SEZER
- Re: Redis will no ... Scott Williams
- Re: Redis will no ... Carl George
- Re: Redis will no ... Remi Collet
- Re: Redis will no longer be OSS... now what... Aaron Rainbolt