I published version 1.2 which doesn't depend on bodhi-client anymore. It is now on PyPI and Bodhi updates are in testing.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:59 PM Jakub Kadlcik <jkadl...@redhat.com> wrote: > Thank you for the feedback Stephen, > I didn't realize how many and how complicated dependencies the bodhli > client package has. It was no problem when installing via DNF but you are > right with the pip installation - > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/fedora-distro-aliases/issues/3 > > Please subscribe the issue, I will fix it soon :-) > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 8:34 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:32 AM Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 5:58 AM Jakub Kadlcik <jkadl...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > Hello, >> > > I just wanted to quickly announce a small project I did in >> collaboration with the Packit folks. >> > > >> > > Do you have some tools or services that perform actions on all >> currently active Fedora releases? And do you have to manually update their >> list every time a new Fedora release is branched or EOLed? The >> fedora-distro-aliases will make your life easier. >> > > >> > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/fedora-distro-aliases >> > > >> > > It defines aliases such as `fedora-stable`, `epel-all`, >> `fedora-latest`, etc. To evaluate them, it queries Bodhi, so they are >> always up-to-date (but the tradeoff is that it requires an internet >> connection). There are multiple examples in the project README but the >> usage is simple, e.g.: >> > > >> > > >>> from fedora_distro_aliases import get_distro_aliases >> > > >>> aliases = get_distro_aliases() >> > > >>> [x.namever for x in aliases["fedora-all"]] >> > > ['fedora-38', 'fedora-39', 'fedora-rawhide'] >> > > >> > > The package is already in Fedora, give it a shot, >> > >> > Thanks! I'll look into updating >> > https://github.com/sgallagher/get-fedora-releases-action with this. >> >> Scratch that, it appears that `pip3 install fedora_distro_aliases` >> requires installing krb5 devel packages (and compiling it) on the >> target system before it can be used. This had the effect in my testing >> of increasing the time spent running my Action from ~10s to ~240s, >> which is too big of an increase. Is there a good reason why you're >> using the complete BodhiClient interface instead of just doing simple >> HTTP requests against https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases ? >> -- >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >> >
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
