Thank you for the feedback Stephen, I didn't realize how many and how complicated dependencies the bodhli client package has. It was no problem when installing via DNF but you are right with the pip installation - https://github.com/rpm-software-management/fedora-distro-aliases/issues/3
Please subscribe the issue, I will fix it soon :-) On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 8:34 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:32 AM Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 5:58 AM Jakub Kadlcik <jkadl...@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > I just wanted to quickly announce a small project I did in > collaboration with the Packit folks. > > > > > > Do you have some tools or services that perform actions on all > currently active Fedora releases? And do you have to manually update their > list every time a new Fedora release is branched or EOLed? The > fedora-distro-aliases will make your life easier. > > > > > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/fedora-distro-aliases > > > > > > It defines aliases such as `fedora-stable`, `epel-all`, > `fedora-latest`, etc. To evaluate them, it queries Bodhi, so they are > always up-to-date (but the tradeoff is that it requires an internet > connection). There are multiple examples in the project README but the > usage is simple, e.g.: > > > > > > >>> from fedora_distro_aliases import get_distro_aliases > > > >>> aliases = get_distro_aliases() > > > >>> [x.namever for x in aliases["fedora-all"]] > > > ['fedora-38', 'fedora-39', 'fedora-rawhide'] > > > > > > The package is already in Fedora, give it a shot, > > > > Thanks! I'll look into updating > > https://github.com/sgallagher/get-fedora-releases-action with this. > > Scratch that, it appears that `pip3 install fedora_distro_aliases` > requires installing krb5 devel packages (and compiling it) on the > target system before it can be used. This had the effect in my testing > of increasing the time spent running my Action from ~10s to ~240s, > which is too big of an increase. Is there a good reason why you're > using the complete BodhiClient interface instead of just doing simple > HTTP requests against https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/releases ? > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
