On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 06:44:16PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
> I rebuild most of the packages
> <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19#Current_status>
Thank you! Much appreciated.
> I left out:
>
> freeipa - upstream confirmed that no ebuild is needed
Yup, nice find.
> rust-rpm-sequoia - I believe there is no dependency on rpm and no rebuild
> is needed. Can Michal explain why it is on his list?
This one got there by accident, please ignore it. Our original query consisted
of --qf '%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires 'librpm*.so.*' which obviously matches
librpm_sequoia.so, too, and that one's required by rpm-sequoia-devel, which in
turn is a binary package built from rust-rpm-sequoia, hence showing on the
original list.
> rpm-git-tag-sort-1.0-12.fc39 - fails to build for in unrelated reaon.
> I have developed a fix and proposed it the
> package maintainer and to the upstream.
> I can apply it if there will be no action.
OK, sounds good. Yeah, I noticed the failure too when doing a scratch build
but didn't have the capacity to investigate further, hoping the maintainer
would eventually get it sorted. If we could speed that up by proposing a fix,
that's great, of course, so thank you!
> annobin - a racing update: annobin-12.10-2.fc39
> gnome-software - a racing update: gnome-software-44.1-2.fc39
> systemtap - a racing update: systemtap-4.9-1.fc39
Actually, gnome-software has been rebuilt for our side-tag:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2203034
--
Michal Domonkos / RPM dev team / Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
