On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 4:33 PM Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote: > However, in both cases at least I notice the unrelated change in the diff. In > my worldview, both are chaotic (read: they violate my imaginary commit-purity > O.C.D. rules), but they are not evil (nothing is "hidden"). In the MIT SPDX > license case, the "mixed in" change is a no-change, so when looking at the > diff > we don't notice it, hence I called it "evil". > > Hope that makes sense. No judgement intended, I know people have different > expectations and habits when it comes to commits (and dist-git commits in > particular).
I get your point. However, I think what I did is clearly chaotic good. Chaotic neutral would be releasing a new version of a software package that contains both security fixes and new features. Chaotic evil would be releasing a new version of a software package that claims to contain both security fixes and new features, but in fact contains changes that make security worse, and all of the new features are either broken or break old features. :-) Have a good week. Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
