2010/11/24 Lennart Poettering <mzerq...@0pointer.de>: > On Wed, 24.11.10 22:08, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> >> Someone uses cherokee web server? Please check this service >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657085 > > Looks good (haven't tested it though, and don't really know > cherokee). In this case however, I think it would actually make sense to > use Type=forking and pass "-d". Why? Because another service might want > to access cherokee over HTTP or so and if you don't use Type=forking > then that other service is using After=cherokee.service it might access > it before the server is actually up.
Ok, I changed it to forking (I tried it before and it didn't worked after reboot - I think that the httpd.socket had something to do with that) > > BTW, is the -C /etc/cherokee/cherokee.conf really necessary? > Independently of systemd i Actually believe we should simplify the > command lines as much as possible, and if /etc/cherokee/cherokee.conf is > the default config file anyway I think it would be nice to drop that > argument. Ok, agree. I created second version without "-C /path/to/config" - let maintainer choose the right version in his opinion. > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Kind regards, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
