On 6/27/22 04:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> 
> Re variant 2: the proposal limited to brige/bond devices seems much more
> reasonable. In particular, the case described below of a server (virtualized
> or not) in a big datacenter is the one case where the benefits of
> MACAddressPolicy=none are clearly visible. I still don't think it's worth
> changing the default, but here the cost:benefit ratio is much closer.

I think that's reasonable. The proposal owners are willing to make this change
to the proposal so that it only applies to bond/bridge/team devices if that
is more acceptable.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to