On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 8:25 PM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote:
>
> So, I'll go ahead and be a bad guy here:
>
> Perhaps it's time to just retire i686 completely?
>
> Steam is available as a flatpak, and old software thats 32bit only and
> can't be rebuilt could just be run from a f36 container?
>
> This would save us:
>
> * all the builder resources
> * all the multilib calculation time/space in composes
>
> If we don't want to retire it now, when will we?

I have considered this option, but I don't think we can do that yet.

For example, as far as I know, you need the 32-bit host libraries for
running 32-bit Windows applications in Wine.
Dropping that would make our Wine packages almost useless, since a
large fraction of Windows software still isn't 64-bit.

But I could be wrong. And if we indeed don't need wine.i686 to run
32-bit Windows apps, retiring i686 entirely would be an option, I
agree.
(I myself am using the Steam flatpak you mentioned. It works well, and
I don't need 32-bit libs on my host system at all, which is nice.)

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to