V Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:56:20AM -0500, Simo Sorce napsal(a): > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 10:09 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > > > Thinking about this a bit more, the implementation of this feature > > > simply seems to be wrong. RPM already has a final stage where it > > > strips ELF files and builds debuginfo. Why wasn't the addition of > > > package notes done there? > > > > The package notes are in an allocatable section, to be mapped at run > > time, so that they end up in core files. As far as I know, it's not > > reliably possible to add such data to an ELF file after the final > > (non-relocatable) link. > > > > We would have to pre-allocate some fixed space and fill it in later. > > > > Cleaner approaches are possible if we teach the core dumper how to copy > > select data from non-allocated sections. I think we would then need > > just a placeholder program header. > > While it is nice to discuss future options, do we have a way to fix > FTBFS's in rawhide _now_ ? > You can disable embedding the package notes by undefining _package_note_file macro in the package which builds in the linker flags. See <https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl/c/4751b01e52fad1ef9c3012675791d979436ff8fe.patch> for an example. Kudos to Jitka.
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
