On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 08:44:17PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 at 23:32, Reon Beon via devel 
> > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Update?
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
> > 
> > 
> > I am going to be overly blunt here. Messages like this do NOT help. 
> > 1. Most of the people who are paid to work on this are on break for 1/2 of 
> > December and some are taking off parts of January too. They are also NOT 
> > paid to only work on this, but mainly to help volunteers cover parts that 
> > volunteers run out of time to do. If there are no volunteers then those 
> > people paid are filling out many other jobs. In the many places Fedora has 
> > volunteers, the months of November, December, January, February are usually 
> > a lot of family time activities with various New Year and Soltice and other 
> > regional holidays. 
> > 2. Messages without extra contact sound like a Boss demanding status 
> > updates because they don't feel like they are getting enough work out of 
> > people. It instead demotivates the people working on it (whther they are a 
> > volunteer or a paid person) and makes them less inclined to a) give an 
> > update or b) actually finish the project.
> > 3. This is a major project. 
> > a) There are multiple python packages which need to be make into rpms which 
> > no one has done. These are packages which need dedicated volunteers on them 
> > to keep them up to date and working. This is about a month or 2 of work 
> > because packagers aren't a free resource.
> > b) Once those packages are built, then a staging instance needs to be 
> > deployed and the current databases imported into this. This is going to be 
> > a tricky problem and there will be multiple imports and blow away and 
> > redeploy because very few Databases travel well without some manual 
> > intervention. Once those those tricks are figured out..
> > c) you take down the live deployment and roll out the new deployment. You 
> > work out all the bugs and go live.
> 
> Thank you Stephen for stating what should have been said earlier. Messages as 
> those in the thread above help me to adjust email filters.
> 
> Personally, I am not paid for working on Django. This is my free time with 
> the family, and I am rarely checking emails. Threads like this one reminds me 
> not to bother with such issues when I’m off.
> 
As Stephen and Matthias said. I'm not even in CPE, I'm giving a hand on
the packaging front to unblock, and while I'm paid by $dayjob to make
improvements to our Linux upstreams this is not really a top priority
either.

As for the other post that I'm not even going to bother replying
separately (please don't spam the list like that) - this doesn't really
feel like a Fedora Change, although it could be one. The servers that
host the mailing lists run RHEL, and I'm hoping to get the dependencies
all branched and built before RHEL 9 gets officially released.

> If anyone wants to see more progress, then please contribute! If you don’t, 
> just shut up; you don’t have any right to request anything from volunteers.
>
This, 100%.

Best regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to