Michael J Gruber wrote: >> ===== NOTE about xinetd ===== >> >> Many packagers are listed as affected by xinetd. The dependency chain is: >> >> cvs (kasal, ppisar) >> cvs-inetd.noarch requires xinetd >> >> git (amahdal, besser82, chrisw, pcahyna, pstodulk, skisela, tmz) >> git.src requires cvs >> git-cvs.noarch requires cvs >> >> <everything else> ( <everybody else>) >> <package> requires git >> >> Note that if xinetd indeed goes away, your package will most likely not be >> affected, unless you actually need git-cvs. >> >> ===== end NOTE ===== > > Also, git requires only the client functionality, not cvs-inetd itself. So it > would be good to get input from the former xinetd maintainer whether > - xinetd should be retired fro some reason (and cvs should retire the > cvs-inetd subpackage) > - or xinetd should simply be picked up. > > Thanks for the clear info about the dependency, btw. It would have been easy > to miss otherwise.
Indeed, thanks Miro and Michael! _If_ it comes to it, the git package has a conditional for building without CVS. It's trivial to change the default for f34+ and avoid the cvs dep. It seems likely that cvs can drop the inetd subpackage without much trouble though, so it shouldn't come to that. -- Todd
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
