On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 01:39:15PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:55 PM José Abílio Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am sorry if this has been discussed before but I do not remember it. > > > > > > The culprit to this message was the review of R-pak > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883047 > > > > > > While running fedora-review that uses mock I found that I had an issue > > installing the corresponding rpm in rawhide. And surely enough running the > > same command it failed: > > > > > > # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ > > --releasever 34 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing > > --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk install > > /home/jamatos/tmp/1883047-R-pak/results/R-pak-0.1.2-1.fc34.noarch.rpm > > --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts > > > > No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk > > > > fedora > > > > 4.4 MB/s | 74 MB > > 00:16 > > > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:17 ago on Wed 30 Sep 2020 10:21:53 AM > > WEST. > > > > Error: > > > > Problem: conflicting requests > > > > - nothing provides R(rprojroot) >= 1.3.2 needed by > > R-pak-0.1.2-1.fc34.noarch > > > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to > > use not only best candidate packages) > > > > > > Consulting the page for R-rprojroot > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-rprojroot > > > > > > we also do not see any build for Fedora 34. I already saw this also for > > other packages where it only shows after a rebuild. > > > > > > On the other hand asking directly to rawhide we get: > > > > > > # dnf -q list R-rprojroot --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide > > > > Available Packages > > > > R-rprojroot.noarch 1.3.2-9.fc33 rawhide > > > > > > And so in fact there is a match and so the packages is available at rawhide. > > > > > > > > My doubt and the reason to post this is to ask if this is the same issue or > > if it corresponds to different issues, one for src.fedoraproject.org (I > > always forget the backend name) and another for mock. > >
> If anything, this is a bug in the R-rprojroot package, because version > 1.3.2 provides: "R(rprojroot) = 1.3-2", which is smaller than 1.3.2, > and hence is not enough for >= 1.3.2. > > The builds table on src.fedoraproject.org is populated by querying > bodhi updates for a package. If a build has not been built for rawhide > *after* the branch point, builds are inherited into rawhide, but no > separate bodhi update for them exist, so they don't show up in the > table. It actually queries bodhi and failing to find things in it, it fallsback to mdapi normally. Potential bug in the logic? Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
