On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:55 PM José Abílio Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>   I am sorry if this has been discussed before but I do not remember it.
>
>
> The culprit to this message was the review of R-pak
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1883047
>
>
> While running fedora-review that uses mock I found that I had an issue 
> installing the corresponding rpm in rawhide. And surely enough running the 
> same command it failed:
>
>
> # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ 
> --releasever 34 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local 
> --disableplugin=spacewalk install 
> /home/jamatos/tmp/1883047-R-pak/results/R-pak-0.1.2-1.fc34.noarch.rpm 
> --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
>
> No matches found for the following disable plugin patterns: local, spacewalk
>
> fedora                                                                        
>                                                                               
>                                                  4.4 MB/s |  74 MB     00:16
>
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:17 ago on Wed 30 Sep 2020 10:21:53 AM 
> WEST.
>
> Error:
>
>  Problem: conflicting requests
>
>   - nothing provides R(rprojroot) >= 1.3.2 needed by R-pak-0.1.2-1.fc34.noarch
>
> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to 
> use not only best candidate packages)
>
>
> Consulting the page for R-rprojroot
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-rprojroot
>
>
> we also do not see any build for Fedora 34. I already saw this also for other 
> packages where it only shows after a rebuild.
>
>
> On the other hand asking directly to rawhide we get:
>
>
> # dnf -q list R-rprojroot --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide
>
> Available Packages
>
> R-rprojroot.noarch         1.3.2-9.fc33              rawhide
>
>
> And so in fact there is a match and so the packages is available at rawhide.
>
>
>
> My doubt and the reason to post this is to ask if this is the same issue or 
> if it corresponds to different issues, one for src.fedoraproject.org (I 
> always forget the backend name) and another for mock.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> PS: no linkers or debug formats were involved in the compose of this message. 
> :-)
>
>
> --
>
> José Abílio

If anything, this is a bug in the R-rprojroot package, because version
1.3.2 provides: "R(rprojroot) = 1.3-2", which is smaller than 1.3.2,
and hence is not enough for >= 1.3.2.

The builds table on src.fedoraproject.org is populated by querying
bodhi updates for a package. If a build has not been built for rawhide
*after* the branch point, builds are inherited into rawhide, but no
separate bodhi update for them exist, so they don't show up in the
table.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to