* Lennart Poettering:

> On Mi, 15.04.20 10:09, Michael Catanzaro (mcatanz...@gnome.org) wrote:
>
>> You're right that continuing to use nss-dns would avoid any such problems
>> while maintaining the other benefits of systemd-resolved. That could be a
>> fallback plan if needed.
>
> So, it is my understanding that containers as deployed with kubernetes
> generally don't boot up with systemd as PID 1 inside them, no?
>
> If that's the case things should just work: if a container manager
> copies in their /etc/resolv.conf, and resolved is not running in the
> container, then nss-dns with traditional configuration is in effect as
> before.

As far as I know, the Kubernetes DNS hacks are used on the
infrastructure layer, not just within containers.

I guess we can prepare a Fedora compose with all this implemented, and
ask someone with the expertise to use it to deploy a Kubernetes cluster,
and see what happens?

Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to