On Mi, 15.04.20 10:09, Michael Catanzaro (mcatanz...@gnome.org) wrote: > You're right that continuing to use nss-dns would avoid any such problems > while maintaining the other benefits of systemd-resolved. That could be a > fallback plan if needed.
So, it is my understanding that containers as deployed with kubernetes generally don't boot up with systemd as PID 1 inside them, no? If that's the case things should just work: if a container manager copies in their /etc/resolv.conf, and resolved is not running in the container, then nss-dns with traditional configuration is in effect as before. If otoh containers are now started with systemd as PID 1 inside them, then this would also mean resolved is started inside, and yes in that case the single-label thing and the DNS-server-order thing might conflict with kubernetes' expectations. In that case it should be sufficient to "systemctl disable" systemd-resolved however, and nss-dns will take front seat again. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
