On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 6:32 PM Adam Williamson <adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 17:47 +0200, jkone...@redhat.com wrote: > > -- snip -- > > > As for Pagure itself, I think this is where we fundamentally > > > disagree. > > > I think it behooves us to own and provide an experience tailored for > > > our community from beginning to end. That's why we have Koji, Bodhi, > > > Dist-Git, and many other tools in that part of the lifecycle. The > > > packager experience is literally the lifeblood of the project, and > > > our > > > contributors are the core of what makes Fedora successful. Pagure > > > gives us an opportunity to do right by them that I *really* don't > > > think we can do with any alternatives. > > > > > > That does *not* mean that CPE team should be the sole owner of the > > > Pagure *codebase*. On that point, I agree. And that's why I've spent > > > a > > > lot of time and energy since late 2018 working on building up that > > > community. It's finally starting to bear fruit too: there's at least > > > one entity interested in building a product around it and > > > contributing > > > to help support that product, there's the FSF preparing to launch a > > > new forge using Pagure, there's the Trisquel GNU+Linux distribution > > > working on a Pagure deployment to host their code and packaging, and > > > there's a few other things I've got up my sleeve to help broaden the > > > community with not just users, but also contributors. > > > > It's great to hear this. Thanks a lot Neal for trying to find > > consumers. I'm not sure if this information was available to Fedora > > infrastructure during the decision. It means that we may have another > > contributors. > > I specifically mentioned at least the FSF angle on this mailing list, > over a month ago: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EJAKU3MO4T5ZEWEBUWIRSGBWTFQU44QK/ > > so at least that part certainly *should* have been, if we assume it's > reasonable to expect those making this decision to be paying attention > to this list. > We were aware and we do follow this list. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net > http://www.happyassassin.net > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- Leigh Griffin Engineering Manager Red Hat Waterford <https://www.redhat.com/> Communications House Cork Road, Waterford City lgrif...@redhat.com M: +353877545162 IM: lgriffin @redhatjobs <https://twitter.com/redhatjobs> redhatjobs <https://www.facebook.com/redhatjobs> @redhatjobs <https://instagram.com/redhatjobs> <https://red.ht/sig>
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
